Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 包养社区曝光-避雷(可投稿)

Channel

包养社区曝光-避雷(可投稿)

@BYshequ88

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,092subscribers

+226 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001431357926
TypeChannel
Username@BYshequ88
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BYshequ88

Growth

4,8665,3135,089.57 August 2026 — 4,866 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,923 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,910 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,027 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,185 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,183 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,313 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,125 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,092 subscribers5,0927 August 202628 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 21 days, net +226. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,799–5,380 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 12:065,092-33
25 Aug 2026, 13:135,125-188
22 Aug 2026, 23:485,313+130
19 Aug 2026, 14:515,183-2
16 Aug 2026, 20:035,185+158
13 Aug 2026, 12:585,027+117
10 Aug 2026, 20:564,910-13
7 Aug 2026, 19:324,923+57
7 Aug 2026, 15:314,866first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.3%
avg views ÷ 5,092 subscribers
Avg views / post
934
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
7
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held11 (28 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total6,535
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC≈4,400 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_7104496027

11 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC57 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#防骗 #曝光 #避雷 #大学生 #包养 天涯包养平台骗客户22000,并多次开盒威胁辱骂客户,客户已报警处理。骗钱也就算了,还搞敲诈勒索! 🍅包养社区:@BYshequ88 ⚡️官方选妃频道:@baoyang000(认准唯一用户名) ⚡️投稿联系客服:@fanqieshequbot(认准唯一客服)

9 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC140 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#防骗 #曝光 #避雷 #大学生 #包养 后续后续:证据确凿,直接跳过嫌疑人直言主犯,胆大包天设局公安局领导,人民日报都以报道捅到大篓子了。 🍅包养社区:@BYshequ88 ⚡️官方选妃频道:@baoyang000(认准唯一用户名) ⚡️投稿联系客服:@fanqieshequbot(认准唯一客服)

9 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC110 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#防骗 #曝光 #避雷 #大学生 平台:阿祖全国包养 之前搜到的 阿祖全国包养 看着发我的资料女的也不怎么漂亮 觉得挺真实的 要求付介绍费5888 我说可以 直接支付宝扫码转账后 要求我再付8k保证金 我不同意后客服同意退款 刚看了一下阿祖已经把我拉黑了 这就是个骗子平台 ⚡️官方选妃频道:@baoyang000(认准唯一用户名) ⚡️投稿联系客服中心:@fanqieshequbot(认准唯一客服中心)

7 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC339 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#防骗 #曝光 #避雷 #大学生 野鸡平台被查有在这个平台下单清理信息以免受牵连,下单认准在海外的大平台,定时清理用户信息 ⚡️官方选妃频道:@baoyang000(认准唯一用户名) ⚡️投稿联系客服中心:@fanqieshequbot(认准唯一客服中心)

7 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,280 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

#包养 #防骗 #曝光 #避雷 #大学生 开始没有说明需要1000u的押金 我提交之后 又再次需要2000u的保证金 最后说可以退款 但是发了假照片 让我往银行卡里面转双倍资金 说是公账对私帐的对冲使用 才能拿到之前的钱 注:这是骗子平台和骗子担保里应外合的杀猪盘 ⚡️官方选妃频道:@baoyang000(认准唯一用户名) ⚡️投稿联系客服中心:@fanqieshequbot(认准唯一客服中心)

2 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC209 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#包养 #防骗 #曝光 #避雷 #大学生 第一次找 避雷 @ww274 这个包养平台@ww274跟所谓的担保平台 思铂睿@sbrdbbot合作 欺骗资金 先付交易金额再付押金 后面再找接口取消交易 让你再转资金绑定所谓的退押账户 注:几万块钱就这样打水漂了😫 ⚡️官方选妃频道:@baoyang000(认准唯一用户名) ⚡️投稿联系客服中心:@fanqieshequbot(认准唯一客服中心)

29 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC≈1,940 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#包养 #防骗 #曝光 #避雷 #大学生 🍅客户投稿 跳过平台直接找聊手阿童安排,被聊手明吃介绍费! 包养圈规矩:跳过平台直接找聊手安排,聊手可以明吃客户介绍费! 跳过平台担保,风险自己承担!贪便宜更容易吃亏! ⚡️官方选妃频道:@baoyang000(认准唯一用户名) ⚡️投稿联系客服中心:@fanqieshequbot(认准唯一客服中心)

29 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC245 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#包养 #防骗 #曝光 #避雷 #大学生 🍅客户投稿 直接找聊手安排妹子,被聊手茶凉明吃介绍费。 有客户想着跳过平台直接找聊手安排,但是包养圈有个规矩:跳过平台直接找聊手破坏规矩的客户,聊手可以无理由明吃客户介绍费!大部分聊手遇到客户跳过平台都会选择明吃介绍费的! 要想售后有保证还是通过平台安排比较安全! ⚡️官方选妃频道:@baoyang000(认准唯一用户名) ⚡️投稿联系客服中心:@fanqieshequbot(认准唯一客服中心)

28 Jul 2026, 14:49 UTC242 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#包养 #防骗 #曝光 #避雷 #大学生 ♾包养圈大瓜 这几个人,安排大量妹子去东南亚卖淫,还发生过好几起妹妹被绑架勒索事件,败坏包养圈名声,国内通过妹子挖走不少包养公群的老板,采用降低介绍费,提高妹妹包养费再抽水的模式无形中挖了很多老板。 这种极端恶心的挖顾客行为在包养圈无法容忍,人家花多少钱辛辛苦苦引流来的老板被你们通过妹妹轻松挖走了,简直恶心至极。 我知道这条消息你们能看到,你们最好现在已经润了,这边已经通知各地条子搜集证据准备按你们了,已经有三四波人在找你们了,现在还在搜集证据,找到证据直接送去踩缝纫机 ⚡️官方选妃频道:@baoyang000(认准唯一用户名) ⚡️投稿联系客服中心:@fanqieshequbot(认准唯一客服中心)

28 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC213 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#包养 #防骗 #曝光 #避雷 #大学生 骗会员费和介绍费,然后还想骗保证金,被识破直接被拉黑删除了 曝光一下,让大家小心别被骗。 本人是第一次找,对电报不熟悉。后续退款时让下载im钱包,想要二次行骗,被懂电报的朋友告知有危险,然后便被拉黑删除,聊天记录也没了 ⚡️官方选妃频道:@baoyang000(认准唯一用户名) ⚡️投稿联系客服中心:@fanqieshequbot(认准唯一客服中心)

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @BYshequ88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,042,454 of 1,624,174entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“包养社区曝光-避雷(可投稿)” (@BYshequ88), 5,092 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BYshequ88.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.