两项竞争激烈的以太坊提案旨在阻止Glamsterdam违反旧合同 该提案旨在通过不同的方法区分合约所见和用户所付,防止以太坊计划中的燃气费用变更破坏现有合约。 以太坊的下一次升级可能会影响一些已经持有用户资金的应用程序,且两位开发者于周日提交了竞争性修复方案以阻止该升级。 Leo Glisic 提出的一项方案是,让网络上已有的应用继续按当前价格收费,仅对之后新推出的应用执行新费率。另一项由 Giulio Rebuffo 提出的方案则是对所有应用统一执行新费率,但允许已有的旧应用继续运行,仿佛未发生任何变化。 他们试图解决的问题存在于 Glamsterdam——以太坊下一次重要的软件升级中。其两个提案,EIP-8037 和 EIP-8038,提高了以太坊创建和修改存储数据的燃料费。燃料费是衡量每一步智能合约操作的计价单位,智能合约是以太坊应用背后的程序。根据 EIP-8037,创建合约的基础燃料费从 32,000 gas 提…

Channel
币圈万事通 币圈新闻
@BQWST
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,787subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 9 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004467024668 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BQWST |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 30 September 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BQWST |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 11:11 | 1,787 | +3 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 06:22 | 1,784 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 7 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.27%
- avg views ÷ 1,787 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 40.6
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (7 November 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 731 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 06:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
币安比特币矿池一周仅挖到一个区块,关闭在即 该交易所曾经重要的挖矿业务在 11 月 10 日关闭之前,几乎已从比特币的区块生产排名中消失。 币安的比特币矿池在过去一周只挖出了一个区块,对于一个曾经处理超过网络 2% 算力的矿池来说,这是一个巨大的下滑。 mempool.space的数据显示,在为期七天的观察期内,币安矿池生成了约 925 个比特币区块中的 1 个,占比约为 0.11%。最近 24 小时内,该矿池未生成任何区块。 其最近识别的区块是974,743,于 11 月 6 日 01:15 UTC 挖出。该区块包含 1,353 笔交易,并支付了约 3.134 BTC 的奖励,其中包括交易费。 这些数据公布之际,正值币安设定的关闭其于 2020 年 4 月推出的矿池的最后期限(11 月 10 日)之前。 币安在10 月份的一份公告中表示,将于周二 UTC 时间 07:00 断开矿工连接,终止区块奖励服务、云挖矿、矿池…
比特币跌后反弹,因英伟达作弊丑闻及伊朗谈判失败引发波动 剧烈的价格波动再次清算了价值数百万的杠杆多头头寸。 比特币(BTC)在过去数小时内经历了剧烈的双向波动,再次提醒交易者杠杆操作的风险。 市场波动的原因是投资者消化了两条令人不安的新闻。首先,作为人工智能风向标及市值最大的公司,英伟达首席执行官黄仁勋承认与一名被美国官员怀疑为中国从事间谍活动的女子有不正当关系。其次,国务卿马可·卢比奥表示与伊朗的谈判已经陷入停滞。 数字资产作为周末唯一开放的市场,最初被视为风险规避的发展。 价格走势 比特币周日晚间跌至约73,761美元,创下自八月以来的最低点,随后回升至75,000美元以上交易,根据 CoinDesk 数据。以太币(ETH)作为市值第二大的代币,曾一度跌破2,100美元,随后反弹至2,144美元,截至发稿时。 波动引发了一波杠杆期货头寸的强制平仓。 根据 CoinGlass 数据,过去 24 小时内,加密货币交易…
币安黑客事件再添变数:黑客又积累了约2300枚比特币 币安遭遇高达63亿美元的巨额黑客攻击后(攻击者从交易所钱包中盗走了18,270.2枚BTC),链上分析公司Elliptic披露,攻击者的比特币持仓正在明显增加。 据Elliptic称,黑客已将价值1.75亿美元的被盗山寨币兑换成约2,300枚比特币,进一步扩大了他们的比特币储备。 关注币圈万事通频道➡️ @BQWST
这些芬兰住宅从比特币矿工那里获得免费供暖(只要比特币价格维持在70,000美元以上) 一家芬兰初创公司拥有30套比特币挖矿系统,作为集中供暖使用,按今日价格计算,每套系统赚取的收益略高于其所消耗的电费。 位于芬兰小镇诺基亚(Nokia)的一座180平方米住宅,该镇因曾经风靡一时的手机制造商而得名,现已完全脱离区域供暖网络,改为利用比特币矿机为房间供暖。 该机器位于内部SunBit,一家芬兰公司,销售比特币锅炉。每千瓦时矿机消耗的电力都会以热量的形式释放出来。SunBit 将这些热量以高达 60°C 的温水形式回收,并通过建筑物的散热器和地板管道,类似油锅炉或燃气锅炉的工作方式。该锅炉在运行期间持续赚取比特币。 本质上,这一理念是如果所获得的比特币能够覆盖所消耗的电力,房主实际上可以在没有持续净能源账单的情况下获得取暖。然而,该系统的安装费用大约为20,000美元或更高,其盈利能力取决于比特币的价格、电力成本以及争夺挖矿奖励…
部分欧洲国家的币安用户被告知需在手续费生效前提取加密资产,账户将于年底关闭 据报道,相关账户预计将于12月31日关闭。西班牙、法国和波兰的用户表示他们也收到了类似的通知。 币安部分欧洲国家用户收到邮件,敦促他们在11月29日每月费用开始收取前提取加密资产,账户将于年底关闭。 币安一位发言人告诉CoinDesk,随着欧盟《加密资产市场条例》(MiCA)过渡期的结束,交易所正在“逐步限制受影响用户的某些服务”。 "受影响的账户将于2026年12月31日起关闭,"发言人表示,并将其描述为“一项精心管理的流程。” 该交易所在发给客户的电子邮件中列出了截止日期。 各种用户 在 X 上 已分享了他们收到的电子邮件,邮件中表示存款已被阻止,但客户仍然可以提取资金。 法国以外的一些用户,包括位于 西班牙, 意大利 和 波兰, 曾表示 他们也收到了有关关闭的电子邮件。 该交易所表示,存款已被阻止,但客户仍然可以提取其加密货币和法定货币…
美国财政部采取行动切断加密货币交易所MEXC,涉及逾160亿美元的疑似非法资金流 财政部将此举描述为其打击伊朗行动的一部分,但该命令基于MEXC在俄罗斯非法金融活动中的涉嫌角色。 美国财政部正在采取措施,切断加密货币交易所 MEXC 与美国金融系统的联系,指控其 它处理了 至少有160亿美元与伊朗、朝鲜及俄罗斯的制裁规避、网络犯罪及其他非法活动有关。 美国财政部金融犯罪执法网络(FinCEN)于周五根据《打击俄罗斯洗钱法》第9714条发布该命令。一旦生效,美国金融机构将被禁止向MEXC发送资金或从其接收资金,包括加密货币转账。 财政部根据“经济弃儿行动”宣布了该行动,其于八月启动的 campaign 以切断伊朗与全球金融的联系。但第9714条款仅可针对与俄罗斯非法金融相关的外国机构,因此该命令正式依据MEXC涉嫌的俄罗斯交易行为。 MEXC 是根据该条款被针对的最大加密货币交易所。此前的加密货币目标包括 Bitzlato…
Gnosis Pay 违规事件暴露了银行卡号、家庭住址及关联加密钱包 一位用户表示,被泄露的数据将他的家庭地址和银行卡号与账户关联的每个加密钱包绑定,增加了针对性诈骗的风险。 加密借记卡提供商 Gnosis Pay 透露发生数据泄露,暴露了客户的个人和财务信息,包括家庭地址、卡号及关联的加密货币钱包。 此次泄露增加了定向诈骗的风险,因为攻击者可能利用被盗数据将用户的真实身份与其加密资产联系起来。 加密资产组合追踪工具 Rotki 创始人 Lefteris Karapetsas,在 X 平台表示,分享了一封来自该公司的电子邮件,邮件中提到被泄露的数据包括他的姓名、完整家庭住址、卡号以及与其账户关联的所有钱包地址。 "“你早已失去我作为用户的信任,但你至少应该保护好我的数据,”他写道。 Gnosis Pay,作为于2023年发布,让客户通过与其加密钱包关联的Visa借记卡使用稳定币进行消费。据数据显示,其年化支付量约为67…
币安被盗牵出朝鲜! 11月8日,韩联社消息:针对币安被盗案,美国国务院发言人正式回应。核心观点很明确:各国政府必须协同行动,共同应对朝鲜的网络威胁。 关注币圈万事通频道➡️ @BQWST
MEXC回应美国制裁:运营正常 11月7日,加密货币交易所MEXC回应美国财政部的金融限制措施,表示平台目前运营正常,用户资产安全,正与法律及合规团队审查相关命令。 MEXC称,将与美国金融犯罪执法网络(FinCEN)等监管机构沟通,并启动独立审查,评估平台的反洗钱及制裁合规措施。 此前,美国财政部指控MEXC在2021年至2026年间处理至少160亿美元涉嫌非法交易资金,下令禁止美国金融机构处理涉及该平台的资金转账。禁令将在《联邦公报》刊登30天后生效。 关注币圈万事通频道➡️ @BQWST
MEXC单日净流出3528万美元 11月7日,据DeFiLlama数据,加密货币交易所MEXC过去24小时资金净流出3528万美元,过去30天累计净流出超过1.2亿美元。目前平台资产总额约44.44亿美元,在中心化交易所(CEX)资产排行榜中位列第9。过去24小时交易量约9.89亿美元,下降27.3%。 关注币圈万事通频道➡️ @BQWST
美国切断MEXC交易所金融通道 11月6日,美国财政部宣布,金融犯罪执法网络(FinCEN)下令切断加密货币交易所MEXC Global与美国金融体系的资金往来,禁止美国金融机构处理涉及该平台的转账。 有报道称,MEXC交易所是全球前20大加密货币交易所之一。 美方调查称,2021年5月至2026年5月,MEXC处理至少160亿美元与逃避制裁、网络犯罪及其他非法活动有关的交易,涉及伊朗、俄罗斯、朝鲜等国家,包括勒索软件和诈骗资金。 关注币圈万事通频道➡️ @BQWST
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @BQWST. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“币圈万事通 币圈新闻” (@BQWST), 1,787 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BQWST.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.