Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐—•๐—”๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—” ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—•๐—š๐— ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท

Channel

๐—•๐—”๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—” ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—•๐—š๐— ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท

@BARDIAxFILEgoat

On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

1,135subscribers

+584 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ€“3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003728004986
TypeChannel
Username@BARDIAxFILEgoat
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/BARDIAxFILEgoat

Topic

Gaming โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5511,1358436 August 2026 โ€” 551 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 551 subscribers15 August 2026 โ€” 593 subscribers23 August 2026 โ€” 636 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 620 subscribers9 September 2026 โ€” 606 subscribers18 September 2026 โ€” 1,130 subscribers27 September 2026 โ€” 1,135 subscribers6 August 202627 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 51 days, net +584. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 463โ€“1,223 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 02:011,135+5
18 Sept 2026, 05:401,130+524
9 Sept 2026, 17:16606-14
30 Aug 2026, 15:05620-16
23 Aug 2026, 08:24636+43
15 Aug 2026, 20:19593+42
7 Aug 2026, 10:35551no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:32551first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

129 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ”ฅ3527.1%
โค2922.5%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2418.6%
customย 547011405377281870596.98%
๐Ÿ‘86.20%
๐Ÿ‘53.88%
๐Ÿคฏ53.88%
๐Ÿ†43.10%
๐Ÿ’ฏ43.10%
๐Ÿคฉ32.33%
customย 544737920703216704310.775%
โšก10.775%
๐Ÿฅฐ10.775%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id โ€” no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegramโ€™s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 129 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 20 we hold a reading for ยท 40%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @BARDIAxFILEgoat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC201 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

BARDIAxFILE๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท x WISSAM๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ VS NANDINO๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ทx ELMAN๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ ferny๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด x alberto๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด VS MEYN๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธx MANIA๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ”ฅ1

Signed ๐—•๐—”๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—”๐˜…๐—™๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท

6 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC225 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Who will win.๐Ÿ† ?

  1. BARDIAxFILE๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท X WISSAM ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ37%
  2. NANDINO๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท X ELMAN๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ31%
  3. MANIA๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช X MEYN๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ31%
  4. FERNY๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด X COBRA๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด29%

The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed ๐—•๐—”๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—”๐˜…๐—™๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท

6 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC257 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

TOURNAMENT๐Ÿ† 2vs2 โœ… PLAYER 8 BARDIAxFILE๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท X WISSAM๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ NANDINO๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท X ELMAN๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ MANIA๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช X MEYN๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ ALฤฐ ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท X MEXROJ ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท LIVE ๐Ÿ”ด SLAYER PRIIZ POLL 200โญ๏ธ FOR SLOT = @TheRealBardiqโคต๏ธ @GCTonetopsโคต๏ธ

Signed ๐—•๐—”๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—”๐˜…๐—™๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท

5 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC153 views7 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Video

โ€“VS HEAVENLY๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง N4๐ŸŒŽ 1-0 COME BACKโคต๏ธ

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿคฏ2โค1๐Ÿ’ฏ1๐Ÿ”ฅ1

Signed ๐—•๐—”๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—”๐˜…๐—™๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท

5 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC150 views5 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Video

โ€“VS ARCADE๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ N8๐ŸŒ 1-0

๐Ÿ”ฅ2โค1โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ’ฏ1

Signed ๐—•๐—”๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—”๐˜…๐—™๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท

5 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC225 views18 reactions13 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

โ€“VS NEFO๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถN3๐ŸŒ 1-0

๐Ÿ”ฅ9โค3โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ3๐Ÿคฏ2๐Ÿ’ฏ1

Signed ๐—•๐—”๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—”๐˜…๐—™๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท

5 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC246 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

PAID MATCH ๐Ÿ†š BARDIAxFILE๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท # 1๐ŸŒ WORLD PLAYER > # 1๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บEUROPE PLAYER > # 1๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ทIRANIAN PLAYER > STARSโญ๏ธ / UC ๐Ÿ’ต > BO1 = 50โญ๏ธ - 60๐Ÿ’ธโคต๏ธ BO2 = 100โญ๏ธ- 120๐Ÿ’ธโคต๏ธ BO3 = 150โญ๏ธ-180๐Ÿ’ธโคต๏ธ โœ…@TheRealBardiq

โค3โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ”ฅ2

Signed ๐—•๐—”๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—”๐˜…๐—™๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท

4 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC235 views10 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

PRIIZ POLLโคต๏ธ WINER ELMAN๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ

โค5โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ3๐Ÿ”ฅ2

Signed ๐—•๐—”๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—”๐˜…๐—™๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท

4 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC274 views8 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Video

โ€“VS NEKROZ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท N1๐ŸŒ 1-0

๐Ÿ”ฅ3โค2โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ’ฏ1๐Ÿคฉ1

Signed ๐—•๐—”๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—”๐˜…๐—™๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท

4 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC271 views11 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

โ€“VS CRASH๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ N4 ๐ŸŒ1-0

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ4๐Ÿ”ฅ4โค3

Signed ๐—•๐—”๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—”๐˜…๐—™๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท

4 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC297 views11 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

โ€“VS BABA๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ N4๐ŸŒ 1-0

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ3๐Ÿ”ฅ3โค2โšก1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿฅฐ1

Signed ๐—•๐—”๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—”๐˜…๐—™๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท

4 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC488 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

666xCLOUD๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ซ is a scammerโ€”part of a scam operation known as "555." He takes "stars" from people, promising to add them to a list, but never does; instead, he blocks them. Everyone knows this. Please be careful and don't trust this motherfucker.โ€ผ๏ธ

๐Ÿ‘8โค2๐Ÿ‘1

Signed ๐—•๐—”๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—”๐˜…๐—™๐—œ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BARDIAxFILEgoat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTCAnonymous Poll35 voters

Who will win.๐Ÿ† ?

  1. BARDIAxFILE๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท X WISSAM ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ37%
  2. NANDINO๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท X ELMAN๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ31%
  3. MANIA๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ช X MEYN๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ31%
  4. FERNY๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด X COBRA๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด29%

The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐—•๐—”๐—ฅ๐——๐—œ๐—” ๐—ฃ๐—จ๐—•๐—š๐— ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ทโ€ (@BARDIAxFILEgoat), 1,135 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BARDIAxFILEgoat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.