I’ll be accepting the next 15 people into our free premium group, if you want to get inside then press “request to join” and then message me @ashleyHODL to get your request accepted 1️⃣
👍52❤12

Channel
@AshCoinVault
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,464subscribers
-25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002228583293 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AshCoinVault |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AshCoinVault |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 2,464 | -25 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 2,489 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 2,489 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 13 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
579 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 150 | 25.9% | |
| 👍 | 123 | 21.2% | |
| ❤ | 95 | 16.4% | |
| 💯 | 93 | 16.1% | |
| 🍾 | 40 | 6.91% | |
| 👏 | 34 | 5.87% | |
| 🕊 | 13 | 2.25% | |
| 🙏 | 13 | 2.25% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 2.07% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 0.691% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.345% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 579reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2025 to 12 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AshCoinVault. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 February 2025 to 12 March 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
I’ll be accepting the next 15 people into our free premium group, if you want to get inside then press “request to join” and then message me @ashleyHODL to get your request accepted 1️⃣
👍52❤12
Well done to everyone who paid attention when I posted $ACT on our free premium 🌟
💯11🙏6👍5
Well deserved win on $ACT for us all, I dropped this cook in our free premium early last month and we watched it climb up +365% since then, I’ve took profits personally won’t ride this any longer, always take profits especially in these recent conditions… let’s go 1️⃣
🍾19👏7❤2👍1
Just been doing some rapid scalping purely out of boredom while I was live in our free premium watching charts, and I’ve managed to come out with $24k profit, I doubt anyone was copying me due to the fact it was just a quick fun chart watch stream, but I figured I’d show you guys anyways, and if anyone DID copy me on stream just now… you’re welcome haha, we’re up 🌟
🔥25👍13👏7❤4
We are SO back, opportunity is ripening 🌟
🔥19😁7👍3
Signed @ashleyHODL (ᗩSᕼ)
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 President Trump says a "US Crypto Reserve will elevate this critical industry after years of corrupt attacks by the Biden Administration." @WatcherGuru
💯51❤6👏5👍2
BREAKING: 🇺🇸 President Trump announces a "Crypto Strategic Reserve that includes XRP, SOL, and ADA."
🔥51⚡4👏4
We’ve been turning mysery into magic, the market (for the most part) has been looking rather sinister… YET we still keep finding opportunities. Stay sharp, the moment you let your feelings get involved is the moment you fail, stay real strong and stick to the plan, love you guys 🌟
💯19❤8👏5👌2
Goodnight guys, tomorrow we hunt far and wide. I’m going on a day long hunt across all chains 🌟
❤24👍23
Signed @ashleyHODL (ᗩSᕼ)
JUST IN: Bybit founder confirms $1.4 billion $ETH hack. @WatcherGuru
🕊13😁5
If you use “Bybit” exchange, then you probably want to withdraw all funds and coins immediately, and make this your urgent priority. Do you still hold on exchanges? Seriously? After everything we’ve seen? STUDY, LEARN, AND GET FAMILIAR WITH SELF CUSTODY. If you aren’t taking custody of your own coins in 2025… then I’m afraid to tell you that you are choosing to be in the loosing half.
💯12👏6👍5
I’ll be accepting the next 15 people into our free premium group, if you want to get inside then press “request to join” and then message me @ashleyHODL to get your request accepted 1️⃣
🍾21🔥7👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @AshCoinVault. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@AshCoinVault named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᗩSᕼ ᑕOIᑎ ᐯᗩᑌᒪT” (@AshCoinVault), 2,464 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AshCoinVault.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.