Тут подробнее:
про возможности нейросетей, маркетинг и ведение блогов
и роста в доходах с помощью онлайн-профессий, которые только начинают набирать обороты🔥
Created
Between 1 November 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
38 measurements spanning 70 days, net +2,855. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,099–32,893 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 38
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Oct 2026, 23:54
32,392
+33
15 Oct 2026, 21:19
32,359
+4
14 Oct 2026, 23:55
32,355
-100
13 Oct 2026, 06:12
32,455
+159
9 Oct 2026, 02:01
32,296
+230
4 Oct 2026, 16:39
32,066
+292
26 Sept 2026, 17:18
31,774
+242
17 Sept 2026, 10:18
31,532
+82
15 Sept 2026, 12:18
31,450
+110
13 Sept 2026, 23:16
31,340
+106
12 Sept 2026, 03:38
31,234
+83
9 Sept 2026, 20:56
31,151
+119
6 Sept 2026, 16:40
31,032
+34
4 Sept 2026, 05:20
30,998
+17
2 Sept 2026, 17:03
30,981
+23
1 Sept 2026, 12:14
30,958
+48
31 Aug 2026, 09:54
30,910
+64
30 Aug 2026, 07:54
30,846
+55
29 Aug 2026, 11:17
30,791
+15
28 Aug 2026, 11:58
30,776
first reading
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 117 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 32,392 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,490
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 52 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026
Posts held
52 (19 July 2026 – 16 October 2026)
Views total
59,272
Reactions total
882
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Oct 2026, 13:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
754
Videos
129
Links
104
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 38s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,354 reactions across 52 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,074
45.6%
❤
439
18.6%
❤🔥
226
9.60%
🥰
197
8.37%
👍
156
6.63%
😍
117
4.97%
🤝
54
2.29%
🤩
29
1.23%
💯
28
1.19%
🙏
23
0.977%
⚡
5
0.212%
👏
4
0.17%
🤗
2
0.085%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,354 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 16 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Рано или поздно если стабильно создавать контент - происходит большой «залет»😍
Это результат ученицы💃
Я говорю об этом всегда - и сначала может казаться, что «это у кого-то другого, но не у меня»
Но а соц.сетях главное стабильность и понимание психологии зрителя.
ИИ - это инструмент для этой стабильности.
А как работать с вниманием аудитории - я научу 😊
Это улёт, а не статистика!!! За 5 часов рилс с моим пёселем залетел на более чем 34тыс просмотров, почти 2 тыс лайков, репосты, закладки...!!!!🔥🔥🔥🔥
А всего-то - применила знания школы и умение применить свою индивидуальность.
Аплодисменты Арине и школе 🔥👏👏👏
А это сравнение Banana 2.1 и GPT
Я как любила Banana больше так и продолжаю)
Ждем, когда GPT "починит" эти раздраюабщие текстуры и "рябежку"
Пора уже, GPT-шечка!
🍌 Обновление подъехало!Только мы успели привыкнуть к Banana 2 - Google уже выкатил Banana 2.1.
По первым тестам новая Banana стала аккуратнее работать с деталями, текстурами, реализмом, светом и общей цельностью изображения.
Я специально собрала один и тот же пример в трёх версиях:
— Banana Lite (второй кадр)
— Banana 2 (третий кадр)
— Banana 2.1 (первый кадр)
Особенно интересно теперь пробовать 2.1 на людях, реф…
Добрый вечер!
Присоединяюсь к поздравлениям🤗
Вы действительно хорошие учителя, преподаватели❤️
И я очень рада что прошла обучение у вас.
Сегодня на работе у меня дали очень сложное, объёмное задание, к которому 4 человека не знали с какой стороны к нему подойти и начать делать🙈Это задание связанное с таблицами Excel , выгрузкой данных с программы и переносом их в эту таблицу.
С помощью ваших знаний по ИИ и таблица…
GPT ОБНОВЛЯЕТСЯ!
✅ OpenAI представила Dots. Что произошло и почему это интересно даже тем, кто только знакомится с ИИ?
Раньше работа с ChatGPT часто выглядела так: задала вопрос → получила ответ → вернулась позже и снова объясняешь, что нужно сделать.
Dot устроен иначе. Это ИИ-агент, которому можно поручить дело целиком. Например: «Следи за подготовкой рекламной кампании, сверяй материалы с брифом и сообщай, если …
🕺🏼Уже видели разлетевшийся тренд с танцем на заправке?
⁉️Как его повторить?
Где делаем? в Seedance 2-2.5
1. Создаем три карты персонажа
2. И берём видео как пример - тоже прикрепляем к генерации
(Можно скачать любое видео тренда с соц.сети)
3. Советую генерить без звука, а потом добавить на монтаже озвучку с тренда
Промпт оставлю в комментариях ⬇️
P.s. а вот зачем уметь повторять треды - расскажу в подкасте скор
❤17🔥13🥰5❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @ArinaProOnline. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вопрос⁉️
А вы понимаете, как монетизируется умения работать в нейросетях?
Да 🤝15%
Нет ☹️38%
Смутно понимаю 🙄49%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
А - Мне нравится быть в кадре, делиться эмоциями и показывать свою жизнь.8%
Б - Предпочитаю создавать контент без постоянных съёмок — с помощью нейросетей.69%
В - Готов появляться в кадре, если могу рассказать что-то полезное23%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 16 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PRO ONLINE | НЕЙРОСЕТИ | SMM” (@ArinaProOnline), 32,392 subscribers as measured 16 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ArinaProOnline.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.