Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Aos Fatos

Channel

Aos Fatos

@AosFatos

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,439subscribers

-50 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001685752525
TypeChannel
Username@AosFatos
Created5 April 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AosFatos

Growth

5,4395,4895,4646 August 2026 — 5,489 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,489 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,483 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,469 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,457 subscribers18 August 2026 — 5,446 subscribers21 August 2026 — 5,439 subscribers6 August 202621 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 15 days, net -50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,432–5,497 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 20:165,439-7
18 Aug 2026, 23:325,446-11
16 Aug 2026, 03:175,457-12
12 Aug 2026, 03:035,469-14
9 Aug 2026, 05:515,483-6
6 Aug 2026, 10:325,489no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:035,489first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.98%
avg views ÷ 5,439 subscribers
Avg views / post
434
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held24 (3 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total3,907
Reactions total20
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1225.0%
🔥918.8%
👏816.7%
510.4%
👎510.4%
👍36.25%
🤔24.17%
🥰24.17%
😱12.08%
🤩12.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC201 viewsread 12 August 2026

⚡ É falso que mega furacão atingirá o Sudeste nos próximos dias É mentirosa a alegação de que o litoral do Sudeste será atingido por um mega furacão de categoria F5 nesta semana, como afirmam postagens nas redes sociais. Não há nenhum alerta semelhante emitido por institutos meteorológicos internacionais ou brasileiros. Além disso, o próprio Inmet (Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia) negou a veracidade da informação

7 Aug 2026, 20:13 UTC422 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔴 FALE MAL, MAS FALE A VERDADE 🔴 Ao atacarem uns aos outros, os principais presidenciáveis na disputa deste ano lançaram mão de informações falsas ou distorcidas. Nos últimos meses, Aos Fatos notou padrões desinformativos de Flávio Bolsonaro (PL), Lula (PT), Ronaldo Caiado (PSD), Romeu Zema (Novo) e Renan Santos (Missão) em menções aos seus adversários. Enquanto o senador do PL critica Lula por falas que ele não di

🤔21👎1

7 Aug 2026, 19:13 UTC356 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⚡ Vídeo mostra celebração na Turquia, não marcha de imigrantes para Ceuta Um vídeo que mostra milhares de pessoas caminhando em uma montanha não mostra imigrantes marroquinos se dirigindo para a fronteira de Ceuta, enclave espanhol no Norte da África, no final de julho. A gravação viral, na verdade, foi registrada na Turquia no início daquele mês, quando ocorreu uma cerimônia em homenagem a Noé. Saiba mais: https:/

👏1

7 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC350 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⚡ Não há evidências de que ivermectina tenha 70% de eficácia contra a Covid-19 Não é verdade que estudos recentes comprovaram que a ivermectina possui 70% de eficácia no tratamento da Covid-19, como tem dito posts nas redes. A alegação mistura resultados de pesquisas de baixa qualidade com dados de uma plataforma criticada por metodologias inadequadas. Especialistas e autoridades sanitárias afirmam que não há evidên

🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC350 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⚡ Bolsonaro não foi inocentado de acusações da CPI da Covid-19 Não é verdade que o ex-presidente Jair Bolsonaro (PL) foi inocentado das acusações de crime feitas pela CPI da Covid-19, como afirmam postagens nas redes. O que houve foi o arquivamento pelo STF (Supremo Tribunal Federal) de uma notícia-crime sobre interferência na comissão. Há um inquérito em andamento na Corte que investiga as acusações feitas pelo rel

😁2

5 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC397 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⚡ Levantamento que mostra Flávio com 68% é enquete, não pesquisa eleitoral Não é verdade que uma pesquisa eleitoral revelou que o senador Flávio Bolsonaro (PL-RJ) tem 68,4% dos votos das intenções de voto e o presidente Lula (PT) possui 9%, como afirmam postagens nas redes. Os números são resultado de uma enquete online, que não tem rigor metodológico ou registro oficial no TSE (Tribunal Superior Eleitoral). Saiba

👎2

3 Aug 2026, 21:44 UTC486 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⚡ IBGE não classifica beneficiário do Bolsa Família como empregado Não é verdade que o IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística) considere beneficiários do Bolsa Família empregados, como afirmam posts nas redes. O recebimento de benefícios não é critério para classificação nas categorias de emprego da Pnad Contínua, de acordo com o órgão. Saiba mais: https://aosfatos.org/c/hgel4ha

1

30 Jul 2026, 21:38 UTC687 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⚡ É sátira vídeo em que deputado ensina prefeito a desviar verba Não se trata de uma gravação real o vídeo que mostra um deputado ensinando um prefeito a roubar dinheiro público por meio de licitações de shows e festas, como fazem crer postagens nas redes sociais. O conteúdo foi originalmente publicado por um perfil satírico que inventa cenas de corrupção de políticos e pastores fictícios. Saiba mais: https://aosfa

😁41

29 Jul 2026, 18:55 UTC658 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⚡ É falso que TSE convidou americanos para expor fragilidades das urnas O TSE (Tribunal Superior Eleitoral) não convidou diplomatas americanos para expor fragilidades das urnas eletrônicas, como alegam posts. A corte chamou representantes de todas as embaixadas no Brasil para um evento sobre o funcionamento das máquinas de votação. Os funcionários do Departamento de Estado dos EUA que tiveram visto negado recentemen

👏2🔥1😁1

21 Jul 2026, 20:35 UTC896 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⚡ Posts tiram de contexto fala de Lula sobre acesso à saúde Publicações nas redes usam uma versão editada de uma fala do presidente Lula (PT) para fazer crer que ele teria opinado que “saúde é para quem pode pagar”. No vídeo completo, é possível compreender que o petista fazia uma alusão ao pensamento dos críticos da criação do SUS (Sistema Único de Saúde). Saiba mais: https://aosfatos.org/c/tyid24q

21 Jul 2026, 17:55 UTC821 viewsread 12 August 2026

⚡ É falso que Sicário foi inserido sobre foto de Flávio com apoiador Não é verdade que uma imagem que circula nas redes provaria que é montagem a foto do senador Flávio Bolsonaro (PL-RJ) com Luiz Phillipi Mourão, conhecido como Sicário. O registro apontado em posts como original, que mostra o político ao lado de um apoiador, contém marcas d’água e anomalias de conteúdos gerados por inteligência artificial. Saiba ma

21 Jul 2026, 16:52 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @AosFatos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Telegram Brasil
@TelegramBR · 116,955
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Aos Fatos” (@AosFatos), 5,439 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AosFatos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.