International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 60 days, net +100. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,499–1,632 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Oct 2026, 20:58
1,617
+2
29 Sept 2026, 12:40
1,615
+93
19 Sept 2026, 02:17
1,522
+6
14 Sept 2026, 08:59
1,516
-1
11 Sept 2026, 00:18
1,517
-3
6 Sept 2026, 01:17
1,520
-1
1 Sept 2026, 17:17
1,521
+5
29 Aug 2026, 14:44
1,516
-1
23 Aug 2026, 16:36
1,517
+2
20 Aug 2026, 05:03
1,515
+1
13 Aug 2026, 13:05
1,514
-3
10 Aug 2026, 22:24
1,517
+1
7 Aug 2026, 21:46
1,516
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:21
1,516
-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:03
1,517
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
568 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
266
46.8%
👍
201
35.4%
🔥
36
6.34%
👎
28
4.93%
😱
26
4.58%
👏
11
1.94%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 568 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❌تا اخر شهریور احتمال داره یک جنگ در حد جنگ ۱۲ روزه داشته باشیم
🔸اگه این مدل جنگ اتفاق بیوفته احتمالا یک جنگ کوتاه مدته (احتمالا دو هفته) که با بمباران در حد بمباران فردو تموم بشه
🔹ما مسئله ناتو هم داریم، اگه راند سوم اصلی شروع بشه که ما در نظر داریم با حمله زمینی آمریکا رخ میده، ناتو هم به طور مستقیم حضور پیدا میکنه ولی ناتو یک مشکلی به اسم روسیه داره
🔸اگه جنگ مستقیم روسیه و ناتو شروع بشه، اروپا به شدت تحت فشار ق…
📊 چند رویداد مهم پیش رو
🔹 ۷ مرداد ماه جلسه فدرال رزرو و مثل اینکه ترامپ برخلاف قبل علاقه پیدا کرده به افزایش نرخ بهره.
تشدید تنش جنگ در ایران و اعمال تعرفه باعث تورم میشه و این عوامل بهانه خوبیست برای افزایش نرخ بهره. دقت کنید، به هیچ عنوان مشخص نیست که بالا میره یا ثابت میمونه، اما البته اقدامات ترامپ در جهت افزایش نرخ بهرهست. البته که افزایش یا ثابتش به هیچ عنوان دست ترامپ نیست و ترامپ فقط میتونه با اقداماتش تأث…
🔴ترامپ به پایان خودش نزدیک شده
تنها راه پیروزی (موقت) در این جنگ،
۲ چیز است
۱-حمله اتمی
یا
۲-شورش خیابانی در تهران و تبریز…
فعلا اصفهان به اورشلیم لبیک گفته!
✍️حامد ملکلو
@Analyzer_387
مردم ما متاسفانه در یک لوپ باطل گیر کردن
تا یک موجی اتفاق میوفته، بدون اینکه سر منشا موضوع رو بدونن، بدون اینکه قدرت تحلیلی داشته باشن، بدون اینکه آگاه باشن، فقط با موج همراه میشن
یک روز هواپیمای اوکراینی
یکروز زن زندگی آزادی
یک روز ۱۸ و ۱۹
یک روز جنوب
یک روز نه به اعدام
این موج سواری ها بغضو کینتونو خالی نمیکنه، بلکه بیشترش میکنه
همونایی که اعدام شدن، قربانی ی مشت حروم زاده متوهم خارج نشین شدن که خارج نشستنو ب…
❌ادامه مسیر ممکن هست کمی متفاوت عمل کنه
ولی هدف و مقصد یکیه
جنگ ایران بیشتر از اون که بخواد جلوی اتمی شدن ایران بگیره و اهداف لابی های مختلف رو جلو ببره، داره مدل زندگی مردم چه از لحاظ اقتصادی و چه فرهنگی، تغییر میده
نظم نوین جهانی داره اتفاق میوفته
از سال 2022 فاز اتفاقات هالیوودی در دنیا شروع شد
تا سال 2028 فضا دائما هالیوودی تر میشه
جنگ ایران هدفش بزرگتر از این حرفاس
دروازه ای به سوی
جنگ اروپا🇪🇺
جنگ اعراب🇸🇦🇦…
طی این یکی دو روز اخیر، سه اتفاق مهم رخ داد
⛽️قیمت بنزین
⭕️سفر نتانیاهو به آمریکا
🇬🇧پیام آشکارتر انگلیس به معادله جنگ و سپاه
شاید مخاطب انتظار اتفاقات بیشتر از اینهارو داشت
اما فعلا به این سه پازل باید پسنده کرد
@Analyzer_387
طبق تحلیلی که ما داریم
🔹گادی آیزنکوت🔹
رئیس سابق ستاد کل نیروهای مسلح اسرائیل
نخست وزیر بعدی اسرائیل خواهد بود
در رابطه با آیزکوت توضیحات میذاریم
@Analyzer_387
🔵در رابطه با نظرسنجی
خیلی از دوستان در تلگرام و اینستاگرام
نتانیاهو و نفتالی بنت رو انتخاب کردن
1⃣از سرنوشت نتانیاهو براتون گفتیم
نتانیاهو به شرطی میتونه نخست وزیر بعدی باشه که زنده بمونه، این یک
2⃣دو، حزب لیکود میتونه اول بشه اما اکثریت کرسی رو طبق معمول به دست نمیاره و نتانیاهو نیاز به ائتلاف داره و بعیده بتونه ائتلاف مورد نیاز رو به دست بیاره مگر اینکه یک شبهه کودتا انجام بده
3⃣سه، بعضی از نفتالی بنت نسبت به ا…
👍21👎4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Analyzer_387. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌐M.I.E.P.E | Analyzer” (@Analyzer_387), 1,617 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Analyzer_387.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.