Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AlphaTradeZone®

Channel

AlphaTradeZone®

@AlphaTradeZone

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,849subscribers

-562 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001375670269
TypeChannel
Username@AlphaTradeZone
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 October 2026
Measurements held47
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/AlphaTradeZone

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,84916,41216,130.56 August 2026 — 16,411 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,411 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,412 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,408 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,403 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,395 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,394 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,391 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,384 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,388 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,387 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,378 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,372 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,371 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,366 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,365 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,363 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,357 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,355 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,351 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,348 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,347 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,344 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,339 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,336 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,335 subscribers4 September 2026 — 16,328 subscribers6 September 2026 — 16,317 subscribers10 September 2026 — 16,302 subscribers12 September 2026 — 16,297 subscribers14 September 2026 — 16,294 subscribers15 September 2026 — 16,292 subscribers17 September 2026 — 16,287 subscribers28 September 2026 — 16,284 subscribers5 October 2026 — 16,263 subscribers9 October 2026 — 16,241 subscribers13 October 2026 — 16,236 subscribers14 October 2026 — 16,227 subscribers15 October 2026 — 16,222 subscribers17 October 2026 — 16,215 subscribers17 October 2026 — 16,213 subscribers18 October 2026 — 16,200 subscribers19 October 2026 — 16,175 subscribers21 October 2026 — 16,159 subscribers22 October 2026 — 16,115 subscribers23 October 2026 — 15,978 subscribers24 October 2026 — 15,849 subscribers6 August 202624 October 2026
47 measurements spanning 79 days, net -562. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,765–16,496 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 47
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Oct 2026, 14:4015,849-129
23 Oct 2026, 11:0415,978-137
22 Oct 2026, 12:0616,115-44
21 Oct 2026, 03:5716,159-16
19 Oct 2026, 23:0716,175-25
18 Oct 2026, 20:3816,200-13
17 Oct 2026, 23:3816,213-2
17 Oct 2026, 00:3516,215-7
15 Oct 2026, 21:3816,222-5
14 Oct 2026, 23:1116,227-9
13 Oct 2026, 14:1516,236-5
9 Oct 2026, 13:1416,241-22
5 Oct 2026, 01:3816,263-21
28 Sept 2026, 03:3516,284-3
17 Sept 2026, 22:1616,287-5
15 Sept 2026, 20:1616,292-2
14 Sept 2026, 01:3916,294-3
12 Sept 2026, 07:1616,297-5
10 Sept 2026, 01:5816,302-15
6 Sept 2026, 20:1716,317first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 15 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

26 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1557.7%
👍1038.5%
👏13.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC201 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

$BTCUSDT The price stopped at the previous deviation. I don't personally think it's another deviation. Will be going into risky longs if the price drops below the range top lane. https://www.tradingview.com/x/4NbxKby3/

❤1👏1

25 Aug 2026, 19:38 UTC438 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

$BTCUSDT Not saying the breakout is currently happening until the previous deviation zone is broken. But it was worth waiting so long for this pump to range high. No new directions yet. https://www.tradingview.com/x/jwFL958A/

❤1

20 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC540 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

$BTCUSDT Closed. https://www.tradingview.com/x/BuuUYq7v/

❤3

18 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC523 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

$BTCUSDT The swing feels like a real forex swing. We were close to hit stop but the freshly formed POI held the price. Since its the beginning of the week, expecting to see some new local highs during the work week. https://www.tradingview.com/x/cM6MyjCV/

❤1👍1

11 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC633 viewsread 3 September 2026

$BTCUSDT While BTC keeps going sideways, I was looking for a hedge, but the market already went down except $LINKUSDT. But the structure looks like it's ready to grab the high before moving down. For now on will stick to $BTCUSDT only. https://www.tradingview.com/x/pQ3FdZEf/

7 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC616 viewsread 3 September 2026

$BTCUSDT We finally broke above after the fake-out to the downside. Moving stop loss to $62,230 in case the price decides to change the direction. Canceling the plan B order. https://www.tradingview.com/x/zMpNUQvI/

4 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC601 viewsread 3 September 2026

$BTCUSDT Still holding the Long position. No changes yet until the price is not closing below the local POI where it bounced from. https://www.tradingview.com/x/BwN1WcFt/

30 Jul 2026, 18:05 UTC643 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

$BTCUSDT Still on track. Collected the downside liquidity below equal lows. Good reaction from the 1h POI. https://www.tradingview.com/x/3u7fouOA/

❤2

27 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC580 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

$BTCUSDT I am still inside the long position. Nothing changed, just no strong moves to the upside yet. The backup plan also valid. https://www.tradingview.com/x/P3s9VVFK/

❤3

21 Jul 2026, 18:20 UTC653 viewsread 3 September 2026

$BTCUSDT For now doing pretty good. Won't be moving SL for now. Keeping the risk as is. Will wait for at least $68.2k before moving stop to breakeven. https://www.tradingview.com/x/31pTgpWL/

17 Jul 2026, 17:55 UTC687 viewsread 3 September 2026

Sorry guys, wrong link. https://www.tradingview.com/x/3MSH75S8/

17 Jul 2026, 17:54 UTC565 viewsread 3 September 2026

$BTCUSDT Jumping in before the weekend starts. Risky but there is a plan for re-enter if the price hits SL.

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @AlphaTradeZone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Verified Crypto Traders ✅ ®
@VerifiedCryptoNews · 18,687
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 October 2026
Sweden_Crypto Whales®
@cryptosignalsandanalyse · 43,813
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 26 September 2026
Rocket Wallet Signals
@RocketWallet_Official · 22,828
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 September 2026
Fat Pig Signals
@fatpigsignals · 41,502
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AlphaTradeZone®” (@AlphaTradeZone), 15,849 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AlphaTradeZone.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.