Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AlphaTradeZone®

Channel

AlphaTradeZone®

@AlphaTradeZone

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,372subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001375670269
TypeChannel
Username@AlphaTradeZone
DescriptionAnalysis, education and signals on Crypto. Contact: @AlphaTeamSupport Discord: https://discord.gg/VAbbX9X3Xj Chat: https://t.me/AlphaTradeZoneTalks Trading is risky and may result in a loss of capital.
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 August 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 19 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AlphaTradeZone

Growth

16,37216,41216,3926 August 2026 — 16,411 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,411 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,412 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,408 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,403 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,395 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,394 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,391 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,384 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,388 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,387 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,378 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,372 subscribers6 August 202618 August 2026
13 measurements spanning 13 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,366–16,418 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 22:5916,372-6
17 Aug 2026, 19:5716,378-9
16 Aug 2026, 18:2316,387-1
15 Aug 2026, 01:5816,388+4
12 Aug 2026, 19:0716,384-7
11 Aug 2026, 18:2116,391-3
10 Aug 2026, 18:0416,394-1
9 Aug 2026, 17:2216,395-8
8 Aug 2026, 16:0416,403-5
7 Aug 2026, 15:0616,408-4
6 Aug 2026, 15:1116,412+1
6 Aug 2026, 09:3016,411no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:2616,411first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 15 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.84%
avg views ÷ 16,372 subscribers
Avg views / post
465
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.547%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held23 (15 May 202618 August 2026)
Views total3,255
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
528
Videos
10
Links
3,840

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1050.0%
👍1050.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC159 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

$BTCUSDT The swing feels like a real forex swing. We were close to hit stop but the freshly formed POI held the price. Since its the beginning of the week, expecting to see some new local highs during the work week. https://www.tradingview.com/x/cM6MyjCV/

1👍1

11 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC373 viewsread 20 August 2026

$BTCUSDT While BTC keeps going sideways, I was looking for a hedge, but the market already went down except $LINKUSDT. But the structure looks like it's ready to grab the high before moving down. For now on will stick to $BTCUSDT only. https://www.tradingview.com/x/pQ3FdZEf/

7 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC470 viewsread 20 August 2026

$BTCUSDT We finally broke above after the fake-out to the downside. Moving stop loss to $62,230 in case the price decides to change the direction. Canceling the plan B order. https://www.tradingview.com/x/zMpNUQvI/

4 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC527 viewsread 20 August 2026

$BTCUSDT Still holding the Long position. No changes yet until the price is not closing below the local POI where it bounced from. https://www.tradingview.com/x/BwN1WcFt/

30 Jul 2026, 18:05 UTC586 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

$BTCUSDT Still on track. Collected the downside liquidity below equal lows. Good reaction from the 1h POI. https://www.tradingview.com/x/3u7fouOA/

2

27 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC535 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

$BTCUSDT I am still inside the long position. Nothing changed, just no strong moves to the upside yet. The backup plan also valid. https://www.tradingview.com/x/P3s9VVFK/

3

21 Jul 2026, 18:20 UTC605 viewsread 20 August 2026

$BTCUSDT For now doing pretty good. Won't be moving SL for now. Keeping the risk as is. Will wait for at least $68.2k before moving stop to breakeven. https://www.tradingview.com/x/31pTgpWL/

17 Jul 2026, 17:55 UTC646 viewsread 20 August 2026

Sorry guys, wrong link. https://www.tradingview.com/x/3MSH75S8/

17 Jul 2026, 17:54 UTC518 viewsread 20 August 2026

$BTCUSDT Jumping in before the weekend starts. Risky but there is a plan for re-enter if the price hits SL.

15 Jul 2026, 17:56 UTC564 viewsread 20 August 2026

$BTCUSDT Was not able to get the entry, but the direction was chosen correctly. So, if you are in - well played. I will be looking for any pullback to jump in. https://www.tradingview.com/x/WDABXcDY/

10 Jul 2026, 18:33 UTC636 viewsread 20 August 2026

$BTCUSDT So the weekend is here and what I expect is the sweep below local liquidity. Will be taking Long on a sweep with limit orders. Stop below invalidation. Profits at the HTF POI around 68k https://www.tradingview.com/x/COrrYRd7/

7 Jul 2026, 06:58 UTC635 viewsread 20 August 2026

$BTCUSDT The direction was predicted right but got shaken out as per last update. The price has reached the trigger point, so now starts the search for Long entry somewhere lower a little. https://www.tradingview.com/x/MJRWbueT/

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @AlphaTradeZone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,384,809 of 1,566,395entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AlphaTradeZone®” (@AlphaTradeZone), 16,372 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AlphaTradeZone.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.