6 measurements spanning 11 days, net -991. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,895–5,184 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 18:04
4,044
-448
13 Aug 2026, 03:45
4,492
-448
9 Aug 2026, 19:51
4,940
-90
6 Aug 2026, 09:01
5,030
-5
6 Aug 2026, 05:46
5,035
no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:38
5,035
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.36%
avg views ÷ 4,044 subscribers
Avg views / post
257
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
52.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
10 (20 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
2,316
Reactions total
1,207
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,207 reactions across 9 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
335
27.8%
❤🔥
186
15.4%
👍
144
11.9%
🔥
129
10.7%
🤩
124
10.3%
💯
106
8.78%
💘
38
3.15%
😍
38
3.15%
🌚
22
1.82%
💔
21
1.74%
👏
19
1.57%
🥰
16
1.33%
🆒
9
0.746%
🎉
7
0.58%
💋
7
0.58%
🤗
6
0.497%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,207reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Психологическая зрелость: 7 признаков здорового пофигизма
Это не про «всё равно», а про «я в порядке». Продолжаю последний пост, вот маркеры взрослого отношения к жизни:
✅ Не оправдываться за свой выбор.
«Я так решил» — достаточная причина. Ваши ценности не требуют защиты.
✅ Не пытаться нравиться всем.
Вы уважаете мнение других, но не живёте ради чужого одобрения.
✅ Уметь говорить НЕТ.
Без чувства вины и без необ…
Сегодня с подружкой говорили про здоровый пофигизм. 😁
А знаете почему?
Потому что в свои 38 лет, которые исполнились мне сегодня, я наконец-то к нему пришла. К здоровому пофигизму (можно заменить другим словом - матерным 😁)
Это когда перестаешь тратить силы, нервы, время и энергию на то, что не можешь контролировать. Или на то, что просто не хочешь контролировать.
Осознала я это благодаря еще одному разговору — у…
Девочки, сейчас у меня нога в лангете, и я почти не двигаюсь.
Казалось бы — идеальные условия, чтобы муж сам предлагал помощь. Но нет. Я ловлю себя на том, что не могу попросить её правильно. И это было и до травмы, просто сейчас стало особенно очевидно.
Знакомо? Мы обижаемся, что всё тащим на себе, что нас не ценят. А потом выдаём: «Ты мне совсем не помогаешь…»
И ничего не меняется.
Потому что это не просьба. Эт…
Всем привет!
Входные прошли под девизом «Ни дня без приключений».
Гонка героев в Менделеевске, 12,5 км грязи, воды и моей воли дойти до конца сохранив корону на голове 🤣 (смотрите фото). Увы, мой финиш в этот раз осталась за трассой — на полпути коленная чашечка сказала «пока», и я вылетела из игры.
Грущу ли я? Грущу конечно, но это забудется, а в памяти останется мой образ мексиканского праздника Дня мертвых! 😁
…
Девочки, давайте честно: женская поддержка — это суперсила, которой мы вечно пренебрегаем!
Это не про дежурное «всё будет хорошо».
Это про:
— «Держись, я везу кофе и слушаю».
— «Ты не сходишь с ума, это правда сложно».
— И искреннее «Я за тебя рада!» без противного голоса внутри: «А почему не я?»
Почему мы вечно слишком заняты, чтобы просто взять друг друга за руку?
Напишите сегодня той, кто на подъеме. Или той, к…
🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 🩷🦋
невероятных подарков.
Два приза 🎁— две возможности победить!
Порадуйте себя,
вы это заслуживаете.
❤🤩Главный приз:
серебряный комплект от SOKOLOV (подвеска на шею и кольцо 925 пробы с камнями ситаллом и фианитом).
❤🤩Приз за активность: элегантная шкатулка для ювелирных украшений.
Реакции, комменты и репосты на протяжении всего конкурса решают всё!
Победителя выберем случайно через @randomized.
🤩…
Пять простых правил заботы о себе для мам
Есть миф: забота о себе — это спа-салоны, курсы и недельные ретриты. А у работающих мам, у мам с маленькими и уже подросшими детьми на это нет ни времени, ни денег, ни сил. И в итоге мы выбираем "потерпеть". Но забота о себе — это не про роскошь. Это про базовое выживание и сохранение себя в ресурсе.
Вот пять простых правил, которые помогают не выгорать в ежедневной рутине.…
🥣В воскресенье уехали пообедать к друзьям в соседний город за 200 км 🌧️ попали под дождь на мотоцикле
🧒и успели погулять с Аланом 😁
❤51🤩46❤🔥44👍26👏8💘5
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @AlinaKabirova88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,032,123 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Психолог на полставки, мама на полную” (@AlinaKabirova88), 4,044 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AlinaKabirova88.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
