Oi, Reginho! Hoje lembro um truísmo do Boni: “Televisão se faz com talentos - que não têm preço”.
👍262😁20🎉1👎1

Channel
@AleGarciaChannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
6,109subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001370027475 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AleGarciaChannel |
| Description | Canal que replica aqui os tweets desse gigante intelectual brasileiro |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AleGarciaChannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:58 | 6,109 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 6,122 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 6,122 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
4,907 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3,612 | 73.6% | |
| ❤ | 771 | 15.7% | |
| 😱 | 187 | 3.81% | |
| 🔥 | 139 | 2.83% | |
| 🎉 | 97 | 1.98% | |
| 😢 | 30 | 0.611% | |
| 😁 | 27 | 0.55% | |
| 🤩 | 17 | 0.346% | |
| 👎 | 16 | 0.326% | |
| 💩 | 11 | 0.224% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,907reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2023 to 14 April 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Oi, Reginho! Hoje lembro um truísmo do Boni: “Televisão se faz com talentos - que não têm preço”.
👍262😁20🎉1👎1
🔁 RT @rmotta2: A culpa do crime é do criminoso. Não é da televisão, nem dos games, nem do bullying, nem das redes sociais, nem da desigualdade, nem da “falta de oportunidades”, nem do capitalismo, nem do "modo como a sociedade contemporânea se organiza". A culpa do crime é do criminoso, que… https://t.co/QYj8CtgoKY
👍349❤32🔥3😱3🤩2
Meu carinhoso abraço de boas-vindas a uma nova terra aos queridos companheiros de jornalismo que reeditam o pessach. Que as águas se abram para todos vocês, talentosos e cheios de conhecimento.
❤212👍71👎2
Democracia em perigo, com Legislativo se encolhendo e não representando a fonte do poder. É preciso equilíbrio entre os três poderes. Meu artigo publicado em 38 jornais, comentado para você: https://t.co/FZCdufQl4i via @YouTube
👍236❤9😢2
Domingo,26. Às 21h. https://t.co/0L7QELdMeY
👍168❤10
https://t.me/promo_seller_ofertas
Como ficam os caminhoneiros, com aumento de 20% na adição de biodiesel? Mais borra, mais entupimento…E os estranho caso das vinícolas, em que a Polícia Federal não vê crime nelas. No meu resumo do fim-de-semana: https://t.co/HuBcwptmrJ via @YouTube
🔥116👍75👎5🤩1
Hoje faz 47 anos que cheguei a Brasília, pelo Jornal do Brasil. A capital ainda era uma jovem de 15 anos. Foi amor à primeira vista - e duradouro.
❤241👍81🎉47
Passagens aéreas a 200 reais! -Vem aí a picanha aérea? E advogados humanitários socorrem presos do 8 janeiro. Meu resumo de hoje: https://t.co/RrY3qmtb4n via @YouTube
👍169❤25😁7🔥3
Comento, nas entrelinhas, meu artigo semanal em 38 jornais. Lula em revanche contra o Agro? https://t.co/aRKLRW0I8e via @YouTube
👍182👎1
Cavalo come laranja? Você paga impostos para ter bons serviços públicos ou para sustentar amores equestres?https://t.co/xL91WpPrHd via @YouTube
👍177
Mais uma falsificação usando meu nome, num texto sobre vacina. É um shorts “Jornalista Alexandre Garcia conta tudo”. Começa com “Meus amigos, atenção”. Eu jamais usaria esse “atenção”. O que me irrita é a desonestidade de usar meu nome.
😱184👍119😢28👎6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AleGarciaChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@AleGarciaChannel named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alexandre Garcia Channel” (@AleGarciaChannel), 6,109 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AleGarciaChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.