挂圈新项目频道 爱恋官方频道 制作游戏: 和平 PUBG 迷枪 官方频道链接: @AiLianXM
👍1

Channel
@AiLianXM
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
5,613subscribers
+4,299 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004392581169 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @AiLianXM @huanWG0 |
| Description | 广告位: @huanjue_ttkx |
| Created | 11 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AiLianXM |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 20:22 | 5,613 | no change |
| 2 Oct 2026, 19:47 | 5,613 | -13 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 5,626 | +32 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 5,594 | +4,030 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 1,564 | +44 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:55 | 1,520 | +1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 1,519 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 1,520 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:39 | 1,523 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 1,524 | +7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 1,517 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 1,521 | +23 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 1,498 | +169 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 1,329 | +15 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 1,314 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (11 August 2026 – 29 September 2026) |
| Views total | 366 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 20:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1,114 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 395 | 35.5% | |
| 👍 | 368 | 33.0% | |
| ❤ | 351 | 31.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,114 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
挂圈新项目频道 爱恋官方频道 制作游戏: 和平 PUBG 迷枪 官方频道链接: @AiLianXM
👍1
想玩什么游戏
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
⚠️今天我整合了挂圈各大热门频道! ❤️以下频道是挂圈热门频道大合集 1️⃣仁济改文件. 2️⃣小月改文件. 3️⃣落雾改文件. 4️⃣公益内核破解. 5️⃣TG高速公益代理. 6️⃣期九期改文件. 点我一键加入全部频道 点我一键加入全部频道 点我一键加入全部频道 赞助商(点击查看)福利姬嫩穴萝莉😮 🍰加入互推➡️ @XZHT_BOT
ㅤ #频道互推 #频道推荐 ◈ Vmeis | 唯美🍥 ◈ 年少不知少妇好 ◈ 红果果爆款微短剧🍎 ◈ 「 叙事诗 」影像与文字 ✨ ◈ 🇯🇵日本精選生活素材 ◈ 🍉 猹的快乐基地 ◈ 男技师/少妇/异性SPA/推油 ◈ 月光耳语屋|ASMR【助眠】 ◈ 东南亚吃瓜基地🍉 ◈ 台灣精選生活素材 ◈ Nf4Kz | 4K 蓝光影院 ◈ 全国站街信息 ㅤ ꕥ 国外话费充值 全网最低价 ꕥ 广告位招租 Powered by @PSDhutui_bot
挂圈频道互管 @huanjue_ttkx
HUE公益项目:和平配置文件v1😄 ✅ 辅瞄智能锁定并吸附敌人轮廓模型 ✅ 人物受击判定范围扩大 ✅ 准星归位精度提升,弹着分布更集中 ✅ 人物模型整体扩大 ✅ 人物头部判定范围扩大 ✅ 智能识别交火状态并动态降低后坐力 ✅ 检测前方敌人并腰射子弹散布缩减 ✅ 开镜对枪时画面抖动抑制增强 ✅ 步枪/冲锋枪/射手步枪全系属性微调 ✅ 人物模型渲染高亮范围 ✅ 人物动态模型整体扩大 ✅ 移动转向手感轻度优化 ✅ 头部命中概率提升 ✅ 弹道曲线优化·中距离弹着更密集 ✅ 子弹飞行轨迹微调,穿透稳定性提升 ✅ 帧率调度优化·中低端机型运行更流畅 ✅ 伤害计算优化·减少异常伤害衰减 反馈联系: @HUEWGbot 公益频道: https://t.me/huanWG0
❤1
HUE公益项目:和平pak文件🎮 可支持枪械: ✅AUG ✅M762 ✅M416 ✅AKM ✅GROZA 功能:单辅瞄 端口: 😀账号 TH886TS 😀密码 TH886TS (在登录页面公告的时候导入功能文件,在进入局内后导入原版文件) 反馈联系: @HUEWGbot 公益频道: https://t.me/huanWG0
———— 爱恋 GAME MOD ———— 大家好!这边是爱恋项目官方频道 我们的团队会做出精致的游戏外挂项目给大家游玩 我们会攻略的游戏如下↓ 和平精英 PUBG 迷你枪战 无畏契约 大家敬请期待我们的发布吧! 我们拥有技术高超的人员并且前作在游戏中有很多的优质反馈 请各位用户多多给我们反馈 我们会一直公益下去的 ———————————————— 合作: @huanjue_ttkx
🥰395👍367❤350
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @AiLianXM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
想玩什么游戏
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“爱恋の官方频道” (@AiLianXM), 5,613 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AiLianXM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.