Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Accident On Road

Channel

Accident On Road

@AccidentOnRoad

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

8,797subscribers

+216 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001505205000
TypeChannel
Username@AccidentOnRoad
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AccidentOnRoad

Growth

8,5818,7978,6897 August 2026 — 8,581 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,581 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,582 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,607 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,632 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,665 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,689 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,748 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,765 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,797 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 21 days, net +216. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,549–8,829 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 02:588,797+32
25 Aug 2026, 07:528,765+17
22 Aug 2026, 17:048,748+59
19 Aug 2026, 12:248,689+24
16 Aug 2026, 21:368,665+33
13 Aug 2026, 18:268,632+25
10 Aug 2026, 09:308,607+25
7 Aug 2026, 12:588,582+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:328,581no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:278,581first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 15 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.6%
avg views ÷ 8,797 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,780
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.747%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held23 (15 May 202626 August 2026)
Views total11,105
Reactions total83
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Aug 2026, 23:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 22s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

539 reactions across 23 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😱12122.4%
😢9918.4%
407.42%
🤡356.49%
🤯356.49%
🤬264.82%
👍213.90%
🕊213.90%
😭193.53%
🥴183.34%
🙏122.23%
🤷‍♂122.23%
😨112.04%
🗿101.86%
🙈91.67%
🤨71.30%
🆒61.11%
🥰61.11%
😎50.928%
🔥40.742%
12 further kinds224.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 539reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
46
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 23 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
46
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AccidentOnRoad. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 May 2026 to 26 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 00:54 UTC635 views9 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

🇨🇳 In China, a fine for a traffic violation can literally fly to you — CGTN ⚡️ In Shanghai, traffic rules are monitored by flying camera drones with sirens🚨 Accident On Road🚗

🫡42👍2🆒1

21 Aug 2026, 01:04 UTC≈2,100 views18 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

‼️ In Moscow, a truck crushed a woman in front of her daughter 🔞 I strongly advise against watching this video if you are under 18, pregnant, or have a sensitive psyche. This content is strictly for viewers aged 18 and older🔞 A mother and a girl were crossing the road on Karelsky Boulevard and ended up in the vehicle's blind spot. The child managed to jump aside, but the mother was pulled under the wheels. ⚡️The w

😢83🤯3🙏2🤬1🥰1

13 Aug 2026, 22:17 UTC≈3,460 views24 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

Car accident in Kazakhstan 🔞 The driver hit an elderly woman on a pedestrian crossing! ⚡️As a result of the accident, the pensioner died before the ambulance arrived ❤️ Accident On Road🚗

😭11🤬6🙏4🌚21

5 Aug 2026, 22:44 UTC≈4,910 views32 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

COLOMBIA 🇨🇴 A biker managed to crash into a cow 👀 Accident On Road🚗

😱18🥴4🙈4🤬32🌚1

27 Jul 2026, 17:55 UTC≈6,030 views19 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

‼️A heavy truck at high speed knocked down a bus and slammed it into a pole 🤯 Accident On Road🚗

🤯8😱5😢42

27 Jul 2026, 01:48 UTC≈5,600 views26 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

Car accident in Peru 🇵🇪 ⚡️The quad bike driver died on the spot! A helmet might have helped☝️ Accident On Road🚗

🤷‍♂10🥴9🤡3👻2🤬2

14 Jul 2026, 12:41 UTC≈6,880 views23 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

‼️A truck overturned and crashed onto an SUV, completely crushing it 😬 ⚡️The car driver died on the spot. The accident occurred in Rampur city (India) in the north of the country when the truck lost control on a turn ❌ Accident On Road🚗

😱12🤡6🤬3🤯2

9 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTC≈6,950 views25 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

BRAZIL 🇧🇷 Fortunately, in such a terrible accident, there were no fatalities 🙏 Accident On Road🚗

🤯9😱84🙏4

6 Jul 2026, 21:32 UTC≈6,840 views25 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

🚂 Not noticing a train is something you really have to try hard for 😢 Accident On Road🚗

🕊14😢5🤨4🔥1🙏1

3 Jul 2026, 05:55 UTC≈7,350 views9 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

‼️A girl WITHOUT A DRIVER'S LICENSE hit two pensioners at high speed near Chelyabinsk — one of them died on the spot😢 A 23-year-old female driver in a VAZ-21124 knocked down two women, aged 65 and 67, who were crossing the road outside a pedestrian crossing. One victim died, while the other sustained injuries and was taken to the hospital. ℹ️ The female driver has no driver's license and never had one — she never e

😱7🤯1🥴1

2 Jul 2026, 19:48 UTC≈5,910 views23 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

🇲🇽 Mexico City Suburbs: After the incident at the checkpoint, a soldier was hospitalized, a taxi driver is cooperating with the investigation👮‍♀️ Accident On Road🚗

😢13😭4🤬31💅1💊1

20 Jun 2026, 05:05 UTC≈7,290 views24 reactions46 Starsread 26 August 2026
Video

Car accident in Electrostal⚠️ A woman was run over by a truck! ⚡️Unfortunately, the victim died from her injuries😢 🔞 I strongly advise against watching this video if you are under 18, pregnant, or have a sensitive psyche. This content is strictly for viewers aged 18 and older🔞 Accident On Road🚗

😢183😱3

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @AccidentOnRoad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Jun 2026, 01:49 UTCAnonymous Poll83 voters

📊I’d love to learn more about your experience with crypto 🫠 Are you familiar with cryptocurrencies?

  1. Yes, I invest and keep part of my capital in crypto28%
  2. Yes, I know about crypto, but I don’t invest17%
  3. I’ve heard about it, but I don’t know much16%
  4. No, I know almost nothing about cryptocurrencies40%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 26 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Accident On Road” (@AccidentOnRoad), 8,797 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AccidentOnRoad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.