8 measurements spanning 23 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,015–1,032 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 13:54
1,017
-4
27 Aug 2026, 10:14
1,021
+4
24 Aug 2026, 13:33
1,017
-3
21 Aug 2026, 02:46
1,020
+1
15 Aug 2026, 02:36
1,019
-9
11 Aug 2026, 12:12
1,028
-2
8 Aug 2026, 00:21
1,030
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:53
1,030
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 21 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
260 reactions across 6 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
80
30.8%
👍
55
21.2%
custom 5456185805544367274
35
13.5%
custom 5348518263993153665
14
5.38%
custom 5345970485098200377
12
4.62%
custom 5456335442204960131
12
4.62%
❤🔥
12
4.62%
custom 5249257150261246147
8
3.08%
custom 5287263788309947464
6
2.31%
❤
6
2.31%
custom 5249449268443364727
5
1.92%
custom 5298728804074666786
4
1.54%
custom 5345829103364750125
4
1.54%
custom 5368303262770404901
3
1.15%
custom 5298977242162936381
2
0.769%
🎉
2
0.769%
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 260reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2025 to 22 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
51
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 6 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ARTSIDEQA. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 January 2025 to 22 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Рынок ручного тестирования умер? Разбираем несколько мифов.
В последнее время часто слышу мнение, что рынок ручного тестирования умер, QA больше не нужны и всех заменят нейросети и автотестеры. Давайте разберемся, какая ситуация на самом деле.
Миф 1: Вакансий нет. Мало денег платят.
Говорят, что вакансий для ручных тестировщиков не осталось. Однако, если зайти на hh.ru, то только на январь 2026 можно найти более 80…
2025 год подходит к концу, и я хочу подвести итоги своего менторства.
За 2025 год было трудоустроенно более 40 учеников, большинство из них вкатились с нуля, без опыта в АйТи.
Рынок IT в этом году штормило, но мне и моим ученикам удавалось добиваться отличных результатов в кратчайшие сроки.
Я вами горжусь!
📍Для меня ключевым результатом является то, что не смотря на сложности текущего рынка, мы с моими учениками …
Чего вам не хватает для оффера?
У меня богатый опыт прохождения собеседований с довольно высокой конверсией в оффер — около 85%.
Максимальный оффер, который я получал на позиции ручного тестировщика — 380 000 ₽ на руки. Также у меня был стрик из 14 офферов подряд.
Что касается учеников и моего менторства:
• Средний оффер у учеников — 221 000 ₽ на руки.
• Среднее время вката — 2 месяца.
Как у меня и моих учеников п…
Съездил в Тайланд и мне не понравилось, пока я…
Прошло несколько дней как я вернулся с 2-х недельного отпуска и хотел бы поделиться впечатлениями о путешествии на Пхукет. В конце будут расходы, чтобы каждый мог примерно планировать бюджет на отдых в Тайланд.
Спойлер: мы брали тур еще в начале декабря (большая ошибка), когда доллар был по 100+ рублей, из-за этого цена получилась выше, чем если бы мы планировали этот…
🔥 Сейчас идеальное время вкатиться в IT и изменить свою жизнь к лучшему.
Пошел уже второй месяц нового года — пора действовать!
Если вы давно мечтали устроиться в IT, то рекомендую начать уже сейчас: рынок оживает, HR-ы активно ищут кандидатов, а вакансий становится всё больше. Мои ученики уже вовсю проходят собеседования и получают сочные офферы .
Почему ручное тестирование?
• QA - это самый быстрый вкат для даль…
Всем привет!
Хочу рассказать вам о своем путешествии в самую северную часть нашей страны. 🐋
Четвертый день я на севере , в отдаленной деревушке от цивилизации «Териберка».
Не смотря на то, что мы находимся за 100+ км от Мурманска, здесь есть все необходимое для комфортного пребывания: в изобилии рестораны, местные магазины, можно вкусно поесть и насладиться морепродуктами, или закупить необходимые вещи.
Первые д…
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @ARTSIDEQA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Artside Blog | Про QA и не только 💻” (@ARTSIDEQA), 1,017 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ARTSIDEQA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
