Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝗔𝗽𝗽 𝗚𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗠𝗼̛́𝗶 🧮

Channel

𝗔𝗽𝗽 𝗚𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗠𝗼̛́𝗶 🧮

@APPGAMEMOI

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

28,947subscribers

-3,783 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002843700353
TypeChannel
Usernames@APPGAMEMOI @TONGHOPNHACAISCAM
Description⚜️KÊNH CHECK GAME UY TÍN + SCAM ☎️ CÔNG VIỆC LIÊN HỆ : @duyanh31 Nhóm chat https://t.me/+mZogRrdbu8Y4OGI1 #casino #freegame #game #nohu #thethao #sport #keo #codegame #slot #banca
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/APPGAMEMOI

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@TONGHOPNHACAISCAM/7333 Aug 2026, 14:44 UTC@kenhthongbao24h/3394 Aug 2026, 05:57 UTC1.0015 hours
@TONGHOPNHACAISCAM/7374 Aug 2026, 06:44 UTC@kenhthongbao24h/3496 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC1.002 days
@TONGHOPNHACAISCAM/7425 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC@kenhthongbao24h/3435 Aug 2026, 04:25 UTC1.001.9 hours
@TONGHOPNHACAISCAM/7465 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC@kenhthongbao24h/3485 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC1.00under a minute
@TONGHOPNHACAISCAM/7537 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC@kenhthongbao24h/3547 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC1.0071 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@kenhthongbao24h5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.9 hoursthis entry (50)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @casinofree888k. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1832,73016,3747 August 2026 — 32,730 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,536 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,155 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,998 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,539 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,970 subscribers13 August 2026 — 30,855 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,658 subscribers15 August 2026 — 29,720 subscribers16 August 2026 — 29,195 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18 subscribers17 August 2026 — 29,025 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,947 subscribers28,9477 August 202618 August 2026
13 measurements spanning 11 days, net -3,783. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 23:3528,947-78
17 Aug 2026, 20:2429,025+29,007
16 Aug 2026, 20:1318-29,177
16 Aug 2026, 17:5429,195-525
15 Aug 2026, 20:0029,720-938
14 Aug 2026, 15:0830,658-197
13 Aug 2026, 03:1530,855-115
12 Aug 2026, 01:0330,970-569
11 Aug 2026, 02:2131,539-459
10 Aug 2026, 01:0531,998-157
9 Aug 2026, 01:2132,155-381
7 Aug 2026, 22:0232,536-194
7 Aug 2026, 14:0232,730first reading

Engagement

72 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.15%
avg views ÷ 28,947 subscribers
Avg views / post
913
67 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
72
of 72 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held72 (3 August 202618 August 2026)
Views total61,168
Reactions total1,320
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Aug 2026, 02:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
590
Videos
2
Links
477

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,320 reactions across 67 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,28797.5%
🔥302.27%
👍20.152%
👌10.076%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 72 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,320reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC165 views33 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

😍😍 FREE 88K + NẠP ĐẦU 180% X3 VÒNG CƯỢC ✔️ Khuyến mãi 180% Hũ - Cá ✔️ Khuyến mãi 120% Casino 🟢 Bảo Hiểm Thể Thao 100% Vé Cược Đầu 😆😆😆😆 https://s8q267.com 🇻🇳 Nhóm Chat Giao Lưu : @NGHIENTRINHBAYVOL1

33

Signed 𝑫 𝒖 𝒚 𝑨 𝒏 𝒉

18 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC427 views25 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻 Ra Mắt Bot Đổi Code Lên 200k Rút Không Nạp 👾 1 Ref = 🌟🌟🌟 👾 Min Rút = 🌟🌟🌟 🟢 BOT https://t.me/PHATCODESONCLUB2026_BOT ❤️❤️❤️❤️ https://play.son79.vu

25

Signed 𝑫 𝒖 𝒚 𝑨 𝒏 𝒉

18 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC240 views18 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Vẫn Còn FREE 20K https://ggwin33.com/?dl=7hm5ge ⤵️ Min Rút Chỉ 50k (Chơi Hũ) 🏳️ Nhóm chat giao lưu @NGHIENTRINHBAYVOL1

16🔥2

Signed 𝑫 𝒖 𝒚 𝑨 𝒏 𝒉

18 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC454 views18 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 FREE 88K LIÊN MINH VỚI CON AK168 🤩 TẶNG 88K X12 VÒNG NỔ HŨ BẮN CÁ 🤩 MIN RÚT 100K VÀ MAX RÚT 300K ❤️❤️❤️❤️ https://www.ks168z.com/?r=oot7388

16🔥2

Signed 𝑫 𝒖 𝒚 𝑨 𝒏 𝒉

18 Aug 2026, 02:49 UTC274 views14 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Code 30k lên 200k không nạp GC2026081365D625243E GC2026081342AF5A0726 GC202608136AB0CA1B76 GC20260813269BE201CE Bot đổi code https://t.me/PHATCODESONCLUB2026_BOT

13🔥1

Signed 𝑫 𝒖 𝒚 𝑨 𝒏 𝒉

17 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC363 views21 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Đã ra mắt 🍌🍌🍌🍌 FREE 58K Rút Max 300k , Km nạp đầu 100% Trang mới rút mượt lắm nhé ae ❤️❤️❤️❤️ http://www.yg88vn.vip/?r=vnz2848

21

Signed 𝑫 𝒖 𝒚 𝑨 𝒏 𝒉

17 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC417 views24 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Code 30k lên 200k rút không nạp GC202608136F3AB98AEA GC20260813289B74DDFB GC202608136D81969CC8 GC202608130D521372B0 GC20260813963D081F56 GC202608138138030694 GC202608132B4761EACC 🟢 BOT https://t.me/PHATCODESONCLUB2026_BOT ❤️❤️❤️❤️ https://play.son79.vu

23🔥1

Signed 𝑫 𝒖 𝒚 𝑨 𝒏 𝒉

17 Aug 2026, 03:05 UTC403 views20 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Done NEW88 ae vào check NEW88 - Avvv - Nhập thành công: 34 NEW88 - Lephikhiem2008 - Nhập thành công: 38 NEW88 - Linhconcho00 - Nhập thành công: 35 NEW88 - Tuansmxanh - Nhập thành công: 23 NEW88 - nqthien - Nhập thành công: 26 NEW88 - baonhan123cd - Tài khoản của quý khách không thuộc nhóm phù hợp để nhận thưởng !! NEW88 - kingluxury - Tài khoản của quý khách không thuộc nhóm phù hợp để nhận thưởng !!

19🔥1

Signed 𝑫 𝒖 𝒚 𝑨 𝒏 𝒉

16 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC375 views16 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Lên tên TK 8KBET - Ưu tiên nhé để tiểu sử @NGHIENTRINHBAYVOL1

16

Signed 𝑫 𝒖 𝒚 𝑨 𝒏 𝒉

16 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC892 views10 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Trang mới rút mượt , có free 58k và km nạp 100% nhé ❤️❤️❤️❤️ http://www.yg88vn.vip/?r=vnz2848

9🔥1

Signed 𝑫 𝒖 𝒚 𝑨 𝒏 𝒉

16 Aug 2026, 06:52 UTC785 views9 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

😍😍 FREE 88K + NẠP ĐẦU 180% X3 VÒNG CƯỢC ✔️ Khuyến mãi 180% Hũ - Cá ✔️ Khuyến mãi 120% Casino 🟢 Bảo Hiểm Thể Thao 100% Vé Cược Đầu 😆😆😆😆 https://s8q267.com 🇻🇳 Nhóm Chat Giao Lưu : @NGHIENTRINHBAYVOL1

8🔥1

Signed 𝑫 𝒖 𝒚 𝑨 𝒏 𝒉

15 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC≈1,230 views7 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Đã ra mắt 🍌🍌🍌🍌 FREE 58K Rút Max 300k , Km nạp đầu 100% http://www.yg88vn.vip/?r=vnz2848

5👍1🔥1

Signed 𝑫 𝒖 𝒚 𝑨 𝒏 𝒉

Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @APPGAMEMOI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@APPGAMEMOI edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 357,996 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗔𝗽𝗽 𝗚𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗠𝗼̛́𝗶 🧮” (@APPGAMEMOI), 28,947 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/APPGAMEMOI.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.