Channel
@AL_K65
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
—subscribers
| Telegram ID | -1004443696332 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AL_K65 |
| Created | 29 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AL_K65 |
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
10 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
👾Our ransomware blog is live; data leaked from companies will be published here! Clear: https://cdn.ransomw.com Tor: http://ransoqmgk6p6km6bsqurtzzk6tim26ksecbrcxrzbwsp64xsoo5jg4id.onion/ Forum: https://ransomw.com
Naz API FULL Database 32.27 GB Naz.API is a massive leaked dataset—containing over a billion stolen credentials and personal data—shared by cyber attackers on hacking forums. Download now: https://ransomw.com/thread/naz-api-full-database-3227-gb-f0bf054d Contact telegram: @WSupported Channel: @RansomWForum
Loading is in progress! Click here to get much more! 🛍️ Telegram: @WSupported 🚀 Channel: @RansomWForum
💵 Click and download: https://ransomw.com/thread/logitech-com-3668ba3d
Facebook Data Breach. Register and download! 🚀 Register form: clickhere!
Leaks added! Join now: click here!
The leaked data is for sale; contact us to purchase: @Wsupported
Unlock the full potential of Ransom W. Pay with crypto, stay anonymous. 🏷️ 30 DAYS VIP $15 🏷️ 90 DAYS VIP $30 🏷️ 365 DAYS $150 Try now: ransomw.com/vip Channel: @RansomWForum Contact: @WSupported
Get instant access to the freshest and most exclusive data you need! Thanks to our verified vendor network, everything from massive data leaks and up-to-date CC/CVV information to the most effective cyber tools is available on a single platform. 💎 Why Choose Us? Premium and VIP Leaks: Exclusive access to the most valuable databases not available on the market, exclusively for our privileged members (e.g., instant a…
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @AL_K65. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,318,280 of 1,628,927entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“@AL_K65” (@AL_K65). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AL_K65.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.