4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,011–1,014 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 18:47
1,014
+3
8 Aug 2026, 09:17
1,011
-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:32
1,012
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:28
1,012
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.8%
avg views ÷ 1,014 subscribers
Avg views / post
342
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
19 (16 June 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
2,739
Reactions total
56
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
135 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
35
25.9%
😁
18
13.3%
🔥
11
8.15%
⚡
9
6.67%
👌
9
6.67%
🤔
9
6.67%
❤
8
5.93%
🙏
8
5.93%
💯
7
5.19%
🆒
6
4.44%
🎉
5
3.70%
😱
4
2.96%
🤨
2
1.48%
🤯
2
1.48%
😭
1
0.741%
🤬
1
0.741%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«Акзо Нобель» направил 1 млрд рублей на поддержку СВО
Крупный производитель лакокрасочных материалов «Акзо Нобель» (российское подразделение нидерландской Akzo Nobel NV) перечислил 1 млрд рублей в фонд «Всё для Победы!» для финансирования программ помощи участникам СВО и членам их семей. Об этом сообщили в пресс-службе компании.
«Настоящая ответственность бизнеса — не в громких лозунгах, а в реальной помощи тем, кто…
Коллеги,
В июне вышло обновление - СТО-01393674-007-2026 по защите металлоконструкций мостов окрашиванием.
Что поменялось:
Главная интрига документа - это исключение иностранных компаний, но не всех. Оставили продукцию STEELPAINT. Также появились новые игроки.
Кого исключили:
Hempel
Jotun
International Paint / AkzoNobel
PPG
Ланквитцер
Тиккурила
И т.д. по списку
Рынок нового строительства мостов сейчас переживает …
Коллеги, добрый день.
18 августа в 11:00 МСК запускается Первый онлайн Курс бесплатных занятий для предприятий РСХ: Искусственный интеллект и цифровые платформы в химической промышленности.
Всего запланировано 3 практических занятия: в августе, сентябре и октябре.
📅 Дата занятия №1 (из 3-х): 18 августа 2026
🕘 Время начала: 11:00 МСК. Продолжительность занятия: ~ 90 минут.
📍 Организатор: Российский Союз Химиков
✨ Те…
🎥 Видеорепортаж: как проходил аудит Челябинского завода металлоконструкций
Команда экпертов EVRAZ STEEL BUILDING провела технический аудит одного из крупнейших заводов страны — ЧЗМК.
В видео вы узнаете:
🔸Почему предприятие решило пройти нашу комплексную проверку
🔸 Какая технология сушки в малярном цехе ускоряет производство МК в 2-3 раза
🔸 Какие рекомендации заводу дали аудиторы и эксперты из Дирекции по качеству E…
Экспертное мнение: почему эпоха «монобрендовых» дилеров уходит в прошлое?
– «Дилеры на распутье: прощай монобренд».
Материал посвящен актуальной трансформации дистрибьюторских сетей на рынке лакокрасочных материалов (ЛКМ) и тому, как производителям и партнёрам выстраивать эффективное и взаимовыгодное взаимодействие в новых экономических реалиях.
Конец эпохи монобренда. Привязка дилера исключительно к одному произво…
ГД приняла закон об отказе иностранным инвесторам в обратном выкупе акций
Госдума приняла во втором и третьем чтении закон, позволяющий отказать иностранным инвесторам в праве на обратный выкуп акций российских компаний, из капитала которых они вышли после начала специальной военной операции.
Документ определяет особенности применения иностранными инвесторами права на обратный выкуп акций и долей в капиталах российс…
Путин передал структуры Akzo Nobel во временное управление
Российские активы голландского производителя лакокрасочных материалов
Akzo Nobel переданы во временное управление АО «Развитие строительных активов». Это следует из указа, который подписал президент России Владимир Путин.
В документе перечислены доли в АО «Акзо Нобель Декор», ООО «Акзо Нобель Коутингс», ООО «Акзо Нобель Лакокраска». Штаб-квартира Akzo Nobel…
Пожар на складе лакокрасочных материалов в Ставрополе ликвидирован
Спасатели потушили пожар на складе лакокрасочных материалов на территории индустриального парка "СКИП Мастер" в Ставрополе, сообщает пресс-служба ГУ МЧС по Ставропольскому краю в воскресенье.
Возгорание на складе лакокрасочных материалов на территории индустриального парка "СКИП Мастер" в Ставрополе возникло в субботу днем. Площадь пожара составляла …
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @AKZ_SKIL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
На каких степенях ржавления (по ISO 8501-1) допускается производить контроль запыленности по ISO 8502-3?
A13%
A,B29%
A,B,C47%
A,B,C,D10%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АКЗ_СКИЛ” (@AKZ_SKIL), 1,014 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AKZ_SKIL.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.