Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

پرامپت رایگان|ادیتور سمیرا

@AIEDITORSAMIRA

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,455subscribers

+111 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003834492290
TypeChannel
Username@AIEDITORSAMIRA
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AIEDITORSAMIRA

Growth

1,3441,4551,399.56 August 2026 — 1,344 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,361 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,417 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,455 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +111. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,327–1,472 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:471,455+38
10 Aug 2026, 17:521,417+56
7 Aug 2026, 13:581,361+17
6 Aug 2026, 18:331,344first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.1%
avg views ÷ 1,455 subscribers
Avg views / post
846
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.423%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 July 20261 August 2026)
Views total16,065
Reactions total68
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

68 reactions across 19 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6798.5%
🤔11.47%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC572 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

پرامپت 👇🏼 Create an ultra-realistic cinematic chest-up portrait of the uploaded person, preserving their natural facial identity, facial proportions, skin tone, hairstyle, and recognizable features. Position the subject centrally with the upper body facing almost toward the camera while the head is turned into a clear three-quarter angle toward the left side of the frame. The subject looks slightly off-camera with

4

Signed 𝐒.𝐍𝐚𝐣𝐚𝐟𝐢 ‌

1 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC540 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔸 پرامپت دخترانه🔸 «متن زیر رو کپی کنید و همراه عکس خودتون برای ChatGPT یا Gemeni بفرستید» ۴۴ 🆔@AIEDITORSAMIRA

3

Signed 𝐒.𝐍𝐚𝐣𝐚𝐟𝐢 ‌

1 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC529 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

پرامپت 👇🏼 Ultra-realistic, vertical 4:5 aspect ratio, monochrome studio portrait of the uploaded male subject, preserving his natural facial identity, hairstyle, and exact facial-hair appearance. If he is clean-shaven, keep him completely clean-shaven; only include a beard or moustache if clearly visible in the uploaded reference, matching its exact style and density. He wears an oversized premium heavyweight black

3

Signed 𝐒.𝐍𝐚𝐣𝐚𝐟𝐢 ‌

1 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC481 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔸 پرامپت پسرانه🔸 «متن زیر رو کپی کنید و همراه عکس خودتون برای ChatGPT یا Gemeni بفرستید» ۴۳ 🆔@AIEDITORSAMIRA

3

Signed 𝐒.𝐍𝐚𝐣𝐚𝐟𝐢 ‌

1 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC506 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

پرامپت 👇🏼 Create a premium, ultra-realistic low-key studio portrait of the uploaded man, preserving his natural facial identity, skin tone, age, hairstyle and existing facial hair without adding or removing any features. Dress him in a sharply tailored matte-black three-piece suit with a fitted waistcoat, crisp white dress shirt and slim black tie. Pose him standing confidently against a seamless deep-black backgro

4

Signed 𝐒.𝐍𝐚𝐣𝐚𝐟𝐢 ‌

1 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC495 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔸 پرامپت پسرانه🔸 «متن زیر رو کپی کنید و همراه عکس خودتون برای ChatGPT یا Gemeni بفرستید» ۴۲ 🆔@AIEDITORSAMIRA

3

Signed 𝐒.𝐍𝐚𝐣𝐚𝐟𝐢 ‌

23 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTCviews —

پرامپت رایگان|ادیتور سمیرا pinned «درود 🙏 عزیزان دل، برای سرچ و پیدا کردن پرامپت مد نظر، اعداد را به صورت فارسی تایپ و سرچ کنید، مانند: ۲۰ ✅»

23 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC≈1,230 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

درود 🙏 عزیزان دل، برای سرچ و پیدا کردن پرامپت مد نظر، اعداد را به صورت فارسی تایپ و سرچ کنید، مانند: ۲۰ ✅

6

Signed 𝐒.𝐍𝐚𝐣𝐚𝐟𝐢 ‌

23 Jul 2026, 11:49 UTC≈1,180 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

پرامپت 👇🏼 Use the exact same face from the reference image and generate a dark cinematic obsessive skin detail portrait — same devastating concept, completely different pose and angle creating an entirely new visual story within the same darkness. Face positioned at a dramatic 45 degree angle — not a profile, not front-on — that precise three-quarter angle where the nose cuts into the lit side of the frame, one ey

4

Signed 𝐒.𝐍𝐚𝐣𝐚𝐟𝐢 ‌

23 Jul 2026, 11:48 UTC≈1,070 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔸 پرامپت دخترانه🔸 «متن زیر رو کپی کنید و همراه عکس خودتون برای ChatGPT یا Gemeni بفرستید» ۴۱ 🆔@AIEDITORSAMIRA

4

Signed 𝐒.𝐍𝐚𝐣𝐚𝐟𝐢 ‌

23 Jul 2026, 11:13 UTC≈1,070 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

پرامپت 👇🏼 Use the uploaded reference photo as the sole identity reference. Preserve the subject's exact facial identity with maximum accuracy and make her instantly recognizable as the same person. Maintain the original facial structure, bone structure, head shape, facial proportions, eye shape, eyelids, eyebrows, eyelashes, iris pattern, natural eye color, nose, lips, jawline, chin, ears, skin tone, freckles, skin

3

Signed 𝐒.𝐍𝐚𝐣𝐚𝐟𝐢 ‌

23 Jul 2026, 11:11 UTC904 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔸 پرامپت دخترانه🔸 «متن زیر رو کپی کنید و همراه عکس خودتون برای ChatGPT یا Gemeni بفرستید» ۴۰ 🆔@AIEDITORSAMIRA

3

Signed 𝐒.𝐍𝐚𝐣𝐚𝐟𝐢 ‌

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AIEDITORSAMIRA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 212,409 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“پرامپت رایگان|ادیتور سمیرا” (@AIEDITORSAMIRA), 1,455 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AIEDITORSAMIRA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.